I went out to Fairchild Wheeler and played the front nine of the Red course. I shot a 60. That is twenty-five over par for nine holes, and there is no weather alibi hiding anywhere in it. Seventy-six degrees, a four-mile-an-hour breeze, soft morning air. If anything it was the kind of morning where a decent player shoots a number, which makes the 60 harder to explain away and, honestly, more useful to look at.
The easy move after a round like this is to close the app and never open that scorecard again. I did the opposite. I went through every category the tracker gave me, cross-checked it against the actual holes, and then went back through the swing video I shot on the course frame by frame. What came out the other side is a lot more specific than “I played bad.” It is four separate stories, only two of them are genuinely ugly, and all four of them turn out to be describing the same underlying problem.
One note on the video before we get into it. It is a phone, shot from a distance, in normal speed, without a proper down-the-line camera at ball height. I cannot see my clubface, my grip, or my shaft plane in any of it, so I am not going to pretend otherwise. What I can see clearly is stance, posture, sequence, and finish. That turns out to be plenty.
The scorecard
Legend: 🟩 Par · 🟨 Bogey · 🟧 Double bogey · 🟥 Triple or worse
| Hole | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | OUT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 35 |
| Score | 7 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 60 |
| +/- | +3 | +5 | +1 | +4 | E | +2 | +3 | +2 | +5 | +25 |
| 🟥 | 🟥 | 🟨 | 🟥 | 🟩 | 🟧 | 🟥 | 🟧 | 🟥 |
Five red squares on a nine-hole card is a rough sight, but the pattern inside them is more interesting than the total.
- Hole 5 was the round. Par on the shortest par 4 on the nine, and the tracker credited me with gaining a full stroke on the field there. Tee shot, approach, putt, all three in a row. It is the only hole all day where the entire sequence worked, and it is proof the ceiling exists even if I only visited it once.
- Hole 3 was the quiet second-best. A bogey 6 on the par 5, which on this scorecard counts as a genuinely good hole.
- Holes 2 and 9 are the two I would like to burn. Both are long par 4s, both are among the harder handicap holes on the nine, and I made a 9 on each. That is a four-shot swing apiece. Take just those two back to bogey and I sign for a 52.
- Hole 4 is the strange one. It is the shortest hole on the golf course and the lowest-handicap-difficulty hole on the nine, a wedge par 3, and I made a 7. Everything else on this card can be explained by not being long enough. Hole 4 cannot.
The shape of the damage is worth sitting with. Six of my nine holes went at least three over par, and the two holes I actually handled were the shortest par 4 and the par 5. That is not a random scatter, it is a length problem and a wedge problem showing up in the same nine holes.
The headline numbers
| Stat | Round |
|---|---|
| Strokes gained (total) | -14.3 |
| Fairways hit | 5 / 7 (71%) |
| Greens in regulation | 1 / 9 (11%) |
| Up and down | 2 / 10 (20%) |
| Total putts | 21 |
Read that top to bottom and the day tells itself. I was in the short grass most of the time, I was on the green almost never, and by the time I finally got there the putter had a full workload waiting for it.
Split by category, here is where the 14.3 strokes went:
| Category | Strokes gained | Share of the damage |
|---|---|---|
| Driving | -1.0 | 7% |
| Approach | -6.8 | 48% |
| Short game | -0.5 | 3% |
| Putting | -6.0 | 42% |
Approach and putting account for 90% of it. Driving and short game combined cost me a stroke and a half across nine holes, which at this stage of my golf is close to noise. That is the whole reason a stat tracker is worth using: my instinct after the round was that everything was broken, and two of the four things were fine.
Driving: the part that is already working
Median distance 175 · Longest 189 · Fairways 5/7 · Misses: 2 left, 0 right · SG -1.0
Seventy-one percent of fairways is a good number in anyone’s round, and the miss pattern matters even more than the hit rate. Two tee shots went left, zero went right. A one-way miss is a manageable miss, because it means I can aim off the trouble and play a shape I actually own instead of standing on the tee guessing which side the ball is going to leave. I am not long and I am not going to be long anytime soon, but 175 in the short grass is a perfectly workable position to play golf from, and at -1.0 this is the cheapest category on the card. The tracker graded it at exactly the 20-handicap level I am aiming for.
The video is where the tee shots get interesting, because it explains why the miss only ever goes one direction. Three things jump out.
- The stance is narrow and the posture is a squat, not a hinge. My feet are set right around shoulder width, sometimes a touch inside it, which is not much base for the longest club in the bag swung at the highest speed. On top of that my knees are heavily flexed and the bend from my hips is shallow, so I am standing fairly tall over the ball with my arms hanging out in front of me instead of down underneath me. A narrow base makes it genuinely hard to load into the trail side, so the body quietly protects itself by refusing to move at all.
- The backswing is an arm lift, not a body coil. This is the big one. Frame by frame, going back, both feet stay flat on the ground, the trail knee holds the exact angle it had at address, and the hips barely turn. Meanwhile the club still travels past parallel at the top. Those two facts cannot both be true unless the length is coming entirely from my arms, and the rest of the frames confirm it: lead arm noticeably bent at the top, trail elbow high and behind me, club falling across the line. I am arriving at the top with almost nothing stored and the club in a spot my hands then have to rescue in a hurry.
- The weight shift is real, but the chest never clears. Credit where it is due, coming down the trail heel comes up, the foot rolls onto the toe, and I get to my lead side. Plenty of high-handicap swings hang back and mine does not. The problem is what happens above the belt: my torso rises through the strike and my chest is still pointed well right of the target long after the ball is gone. When the body stalls like that, the hands have to square the face on their own, and hands flipping past a stalled body is the textbook recipe for a pull.
Two misses left, zero right. The dispersion chart and the video are describing the same golf swing from two different angles, which is the most useful thing that happened in this entire review.
Then there is the finish, or the total absence of one. In every clip the club wraps low and flat around my body at about waist height, the arms fold early, the chest stops short of the target, and I am still hunched over the ball instead of standing tall on my lead leg. There is not a single swing in the footage where I hold a balanced finish and watch the ball fly. A short finish is usually a symptom rather than a cause, because you cannot finish a swing you never fully turned in the first place. But it works in reverse too, and that is the part I intend to use: trying to finish tall and balanced forces the rotation that was missing on the way back. One intention, several fixes.
Approach: the biggest leak on the card
SG -6.8 · GIR 1/9 (11%) · Average proximity 70 feet · One approach inside 20 feet all day
Seventy feet is twenty-three yards. That is the average distance my approach shots finished from the hole, and only one shot all morning finished inside twenty feet. This is where the round actually got away from me.
| Approach distance | Strokes gained |
|---|---|
| Under 100 yards | -3.8 |
| 100 to 150 yards | -2.0 |
| 150 to 200 yards | -0.5 |
| 200+ yards | -0.5 |
The long clubs were basically neutral. Every meaningful stroke I lost on approach, I lost with a wedge or a short iron in my hands, and -5.8 of the -6.8 came from inside 150 yards.
The reason that hurts so much is structural, and it links straight back to the driving section:
- The par 4s on this nine mostly run well past 300 yards, and a couple of them are over 400.
- My median drive is 175.
- That means I am rarely playing a par 4 as a two-shot hole. I am playing most of them as three-shot holes.
- So my actual scoring club, the one that decides whether I make bogey or a snowman, is a wedge from inside 125 yards.
- The wedge is the single worst club in my bag right now.
My most common shot in golf is the shot I am worst at. That is the whole round in one sentence, and it explains the 11% greens in regulation without needing any further theory.
The iron footage tells the same story the driver footage did. Same quiet legs, same long arm-driven backswing, same hurried move from the top, except with a shorter club that all shows up as an inconsistent low point rather than a curve. One frame does catch a genuinely good one, head steady, turf spray flying forward of the ball, clean ball-first contact. That is the swing that produced the par on hole 5. But the swing is being timed by my hands rather than run by my body, and hand-timed contact is a coin flip. Eleven percent greens and a seventy-foot average is what a coin flip looks like once you write it down.
The finish matters even more here than it does off the tee. Every wedge clip ends the same way, with the arms folding and the club wrapping low around my waist and my chest short of the target. A decelerating, unfinished swing is the fastest way there is to destroy wedge distance control. You cannot hit a seventy-yard shot the same distance twice when the length of the backswing changes every time and the through-swing quits at a different point on every rep. The -3.8 from inside 100 yards is not a mystery at all. It is an unfinished swing with no calibrated yardages behind it.
Short game: quietly the best category of the day
SG -0.5 · Up and down 2/10 · Average proximity 19 feet · 2 chips inside 5 feet · Every single chance from rough
Two for ten looks awful on a stat sheet and the app scolded me for it, but the context underneath the number changes the picture completely. Look at the lie column: rough, rough, rough, ten times out of ten. Not one short-game shot all day came from a clean fairway lie, because I never missed a green from a position that would give me one.
Averaging nineteen feet from thick rough is not bad work at all. It is simply not close enough to convert, because a nineteen-footer goes in roughly one time in ten for anybody on earth. The two that did convert were the highlights of my morning:
- A chip on hole 5 that finished at five feet and got holed, which is the save that produced the only par on the card.
- A chip on hole 6 that finished at zero feet, meaning it went in from off the green.
There is one genuinely painful entry in there too. The card shows a chance on hole 8 where I got the ball to two feet and still did not convert. That is not a technique problem, a distance problem, or a bad-lie problem. That is a putt I gave away, and it belongs in the putting section below rather than this one.
The short-game clips are also the least alarming footage of the day, which makes sense. A shorter swing gives the arms less room to take over, so the body-quiet, hands-active pattern does less damage. The setup habits still travel, though. Same tall squatty posture, same narrow base, same abbreviated through-swing where the arms fold and the club stops around waist height. Out of thick rough that is survivable, because the grass slows the club down anyway and the ball comes out soft. Off a tight lie it would not be, and that is a bill that comes due later.
Bottom line: the short game cost me half a stroke across nine holes. Of everything in this round it is the last thing I need to touch, and the setup habits will clean themselves up as soon as the full swing does.
Putting: 21 putts and three three-putts
SG -6.0 · 21 putts · 2 one-putts · 3 three-putts · Average first putt 13 feet
Twenty-one putts across nine holes is 2.3 per green. Getting the first putt to thirteen feet on average is respectable given that I was chipping on from the rough almost every hole, which means the wedge actually did its job of getting me to a reasonable first putt. The putter is what failed from there.
| Putt distance | Strokes gained |
|---|---|
| 0 to 5 feet | -1.6 |
| 6 to 10 feet | -2.8 |
| 11 to 20 feet | +1.7 |
| 21 to 30 feet | -2.3 |
| 31+ feet | 0.0 |
This chart is strange and extremely useful, and it is worth reading slowly:
- From eleven to twenty feet I actually gained almost two strokes. That is the single best number I posted in any category all day.
- From six to ten feet I lost nearly three.
- Inside ten feet in total, I lost 4.4 strokes.
- From twenty-one to thirty feet, the lag range, I lost another 2.3.
- Between those two zones, that is -6.7 in a category that finished at -6.0. Everything else on the greens was fine.
So it is almost certainly not the stroke. If I genuinely could not putt, I would not be plus-1.7 from eleven to twenty feet on the same greens on the same morning. What it looks like from here is that the medium-length putts get a free, reactive, unbothered stroke because I do not expect to make them, and the short ones get a careful, steered, self-conscious one because I think I should. The putts I am supposed to make are the ones I am tightening up over. The two-foot chip on hole 8 that never went in is the same fingerprint.
The -2.3 from lag range is the other half of the problem, and the two halves feed each other. A first putt from twenty-five feet that finishes six or seven feet away hands me exactly the putt I am worst at, under exactly the conditions where I am most likely to steer it. That is how a three-putt is actually built. Not one terrible stroke, but a mediocre lag followed by a nervous short one.
This is also the one place the video cannot help me. The green footage is shot from too far away to read a stroke, so all I can see is setup and rhythm. What I can see looks calm and unhurried, which fits being plus-1.7 from the eleven-to-twenty-foot range. Whatever is going wrong from six feet is not happening at a scale a phone camera thirty yards away is going to catch, and that is its own kind of evidence. If the miss were mechanical, it would show up at every distance. It does not. Next round the phone goes down at green level for a few putts, because this is the category actually standing between me and my goal.
The one thing the numbers argue about
My goal is a 20 handicap. Measured against that benchmark rather than against par, the tracker graded my four categories like this:
| Category | Level played |
|---|---|
| Driving | 20-handicap ✅ |
| Approach | 20-handicap ✅ |
| Short game | 20-handicap ✅ |
| Putting | 30-handicap ❌ |
Now hold that up against the raw strokes-gained table, where approach (-6.8) cost me more than putting (-6.0). Both of those things are true at the same time, and they are answering two different questions.
- Approach lost the most strokes in absolute terms. It is the biggest hole in the boat and the largest single number on the card.
- But approach lost them at the rate a 20-handicap loses them. It is bad in exactly the way I am currently supposed to be bad. Fixing it moves me forward, but it is not the thing keeping me from my goal.
- Putting is the only category playing ten handicap strokes below the target. It is the outlier. It is the one number that does not belong with the others.
- Putting is also the faster fix, because it is not a ball-striking-and-distance-control project that takes a season. It is a six-foot-putt problem, and I already have direct evidence from eleven to twenty feet that the stroke itself works.
So the honest answer to “what do I work on” depends entirely on the timeframe. Approach is where the strokes are. Putting is where the gap to the goal is.
Main priority coming out of this round: putting. Then wedges.
The practice plan
Deliberately short. Five things, in priority order, and nothing else until these move.
- Six to ten footers, under pressure. This is the -2.8 and it is the whole thesis of the round. Not raking twenty balls from the same spot, because that builds a groove and not a skill. One ball, one read, one stroke, then move to a new spot. Add a make-three-in-a-row-to-leave rule so there is something on the line, because the miss looks like tension and tension only ever shows up when something is at stake.
- Lag putts from 20 to 30 feet into a three-foot circle. This kills the three-putts at the source instead of treating the symptom. If the first putt finishes inside three feet, the second one is never the length I am scared of. Ten balls from twenty-five feet, count how many finish inside the circle, write the number down, then beat that number next session.
- Wedge yardages inside 125. Not full swings at a green, actual calibrated distances. What does my 60-yard swing look like? My 80? My 100? Right now I do not have numbers, I have hopes, and -3.8 from inside 100 yards is what hoping costs on a scorecard. This is the biggest single strokes bucket in the round and it is the one nobody wants to spend a Saturday on.
- Up and downs from rough lies. Not the pristine practice-green lie next to the flag. The nasty one, in the thick stuff, with an awkward stance. Ten out of ten chances came from rough and that is not going to change until the greens-in-regulation number does.
- One swing thought and only one: hold the finish. Tall on the lead leg, trail toe down, chest at the target, three-count before I move. If I cannot hold it, the swing was too long or too fast. That single rule quietly pressures everything the video flagged, the arm-lift backswing, the stalled chest, the deceleration wrecking my wedge distances, without giving me a mechanical checkpoint to think about over the ball. The only setup change I will bother with alongside it is widening the driver stance a couple of inches and flaring the trail foot.
Notice what is not on that list: rebuilding the golf swing. The tee ball is already at goal level with a manageable one-way miss, and the finish drill will clean up more of it than any overhaul would.
What I am taking with me
I shot 60 on the front nine at Fairchild Wheeler Red and the round still handed me a clear map, which is more than most good rounds do. Hole 5 says the good version of this game exists and shows up occasionally. The driving stats say the tee shot is not the problem people assume it is. The short game from rough says the chipping is far closer than 2-for-10 makes it sound. The strokes are sitting in two specific places: a putter that gets careful inside ten feet, and a wedge with no calibrated numbers behind it. Both of those are fixable on a practice green and a range, without new clubs and without rebuilding anything.
And the footage kept saying one thing in four different accents. The arms are running this golf swing and the body is along for the ride. It shows up as a pull off the tee, a coin-flip low point with the irons, an unfinished wedge, and a chip that survives only because the grass is soft. One root cause, four symptoms. Widen the base, shorten the backswing, finish tall.
Next time out I am not chasing a score at all. I am chasing three numbers:
- Zero three-putts.
- More than two greens in regulation.
- Every wedge hit from a distance I have actually rehearsed.
Get those three and the score takes care of itself.
Discover more from David Golfs
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.